{"id":"aff2fe73b6cc","type":"article","url":"https://hartvaat.nl/2017/01/24/percutane-mechanische-ondersteuning-versus-iabp-bij-cardiogene-shock-meta-analys/","title":"Percutane mechanische ondersteuning versus IABP bij cardiogene shock: meta-analyse","title_en":"Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Treating Cardiogenic Shock: Meta-Analysis.","category":"algemeen","category_label":"Algemeen","professions":["cardioloog"],"tags":["cardiogene-shock"],"journal":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.026","source_url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.026","authors":["Dagmar M Ouweneel","Erlend Eriksen","Melchior Seyfarth","José P S Henriques"],"significance":7,"published":"2017-01-24","source_date":"2017-01-24","image":"","kennis":["https://hartvaat.nl/kennis/coronairlijden/stemi/","https://hartvaat.nl/kennis/kleplijden/klepprothese-mechanisch-biologisch/"],"congress":"","summary_en":"This meta-analysis summarized the available evidence comparing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support with intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock, pooling outcomes across the limited randomized data.","created":"2026-07-03T10:26:31Z","updated":"2026-07-03T13:25:50Z","licence":"Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.","body_markdown":"Meta-analyse die de beschikbare evidence samenvat over percutane mechanische circulatoire ondersteuning versus IABP bij cardiogene shock. Relevant voor het device-selectiebeleid bij kritiek zieke patiënten.","abstract_original":""}