# Late trombotische events na bioresorbeerbare scaffold: meta-analyse van gerandomiseerde trials

*geplaatst 2017-09-01 · Algemeen · European heart journal · doi 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx155 · https://hartvaat.nl/2017/09/01/late-trombotische-events-na-bioresorbeerbare-scaffold-meta-analyse-van-gerandomi/*

Meta-analyse die het risico op late trombotische events na bioresorbeerbare scaffold-implantatie kwantificeerde. Definitief bewijs voor het verhoogde langetermijnrisico.

## English: Late thrombotic events after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

This meta-analysis quantified the risk of late thrombotic events after bioresorbable scaffold implantation, demonstrating a significantly higher rate of very late scaffold thrombosis compared with metallic everolimus-eluting stents.

## Abstract (original, from the publication)

AIMS: To compare the long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) with everolimus-eluting stent (EES) after percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated with BVS and EES with at least 24 months follow-up was performed. Adjusted random-effect model by the Knapp-Hartung method was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary safety outcome of interest was the risk of definite/probable device thrombosis (DT). The primary efficacy outcome of interest was the risk of target lesion failure (TLF). Five randomized clinical trials (n = 1730) were included. Patients treated with Absorb BVS had a higher risk of definite/probable DT compared with patients treated with EES (OR 2.93, 95%CI 1.37-6.26, P = 0.01). Very late DT (VLDT) occurred in 13 patients [12/996 (1.4%, 95%CI: 0.08-2.5) Absorb BVS vs. 1/701 (0.5%, 95%CI: 0.2-1.6) EES; OR 3.04; 95%CI 1.2-7.68, P = 0.03], 92% of the VLDT in the BVS group occurred in the absence of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients treated with Absorb BVS had a trend towards higher risk of TLF (OR 1.48, 95%CI 0.90-2.42, P = 0.09), driven by a higher risk of target vessel myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization. No difference was found in the risk of cardiac death. CONCLUSION: Compared with EES, the use of Absorb BVS was associated with a higher rate of DT and a trend towards higher risk of TLF. VLDT occurred in 1.4% of the patients, the majority of these events occurred in the absence of DAPT.

Auteurs: Carlos Collet, Taku Asano, Yosuke Miyazaki, Erhan Tenekecioglu, Yuki Katagiri, Yohei Sotomi, Rafael Cavalcante, Robbert J de Winter, Takeshi Kimura, Runlin Gao, Serban Puricel, Stéphane Cook, Davide Capodanno, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W Serruys

---
Bron: European heart journal, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx155. Bijgewerkt 2026-07-03T13:26:10Z. Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.