{"id":"034274139fe0","type":"article","url":"https://hartvaat.nl/2018/01/01/energiebron-en-vroeg-af-recidief-cryoballon-versus-radiofrequentie/","title":"Energiebron en vroeg AF-recidief: cryoballon versus radiofrequentie","title_en":"Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation.","category":"atriumfibrilleren","category_label":"Atriumfibrilleren","professions":["cardioloog"],"tags":["cryoablatie","pulsed-field-ablatie-atriumfibrilleren"],"journal":"Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology","doi":"10.1093/europace/euw307","source_url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw307","authors":["Melanie A Gunawardene","Boris A Hoffmann","Benjamin Schaeffer","Da-Un Chung","Julia Moser","Ruken Oezge Akbulak","Mario Jularic","Christian Eickholt","Jana Nuehrich","Christian Meyer","Stephan Willems"],"significance":5,"published":"2018-01-01","source_date":"2018-01-01","image":"","kennis":[],"congress":"","summary_en":"This comparison of early AF recurrence rates between second-generation cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation characterized the post-ablation inflammatory response and its influence on early rhythm outcomes.","created":"2026-07-03T10:27:04Z","updated":"2026-07-03T13:26:20Z","licence":"Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.","body_markdown":"Vergelijking van vroege AF-recidieven na cryoballon- versus radiofrequentieablatie. Onderzoekt of de energiebron het postablatie-inflammatiepatroon beïnvloedt.","abstract_original":"INTRODUCTION: Comparative data of early recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation (ERAF) following second-generation cryoballoon (CB-G2) and radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in paroxysmal AF (PAF) are rare. We randomized PAF patients into either PVI with CB-G2 (group 1) or PVI with a combined RFC-approach applying contact force (CF) with the endpoint of unexcitability (group 2) to investigate ERAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In group 1 (n = 30), CB-G2-PVI was performed. After CF-PVI in group 2 (n = 30), bipolar pacing on the ablation line and additional ablation until unexcitability was conducted. Follow-up included 48 h of in-hospital monitoring followed by 5-day Holter ECGs 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 months postablation to evaluate ERAF. Acute PVI was reached in 100% of group 2 and in 99% of group 1. Shorter procedure durations (98.0 ± 21.9 vs. 114.3 ± 18.7 min, P < 0.05) but extended fluoroscopy times (15.4 ± 3.9 vs. 10.0 ± 4.3 min, P < 0.05) were found in the CB-G2 group. Ten non-severe complications occurred (6 vs. 4 in group 1 and 2, P = 0.73). In group 2, five patients suffered from ERAF vs. seven patients in group 1 (P = 0.67). The time until the occurrence of ERAF was shorter in group 2 (1 day (q1-q3: 1-4.5)) when compared with group 1 (22 (q1-q3: 6-54) days, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION: ERAF rates were equal among groups; however, they occurred earlier in the initial phase after RFC ablation when compared with CB-G2. PVI utilizing cryoablation is associated with shorter procedure durations but extended fluoroscopy time while being similarly secure."}