{"id":"53c8d9f6f751","type":"article","url":"https://hartvaat.nl/2020/11/07/drug-coated-balloons-versus-des-bij-kleine-coronairarterien-lancet-basket-small-/","title":"Drug-coated balloons versus DES bij kleine coronairarteriën: Lancet BASKET-SMALL 2 langetermijn","title_en":"Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): 3-year follow-up of a randomised, non-inferiority trial.","category":"algemeen","category_label":"Algemeen","professions":["cardioloog"],"tags":[],"journal":"Lancet (London, England)","doi":"10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32173-5","source_url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32173-5","authors":["Raban V Jeger","Ahmed Farah","Marc-Alexander Ohlow","Norman Mangner","Sven Möbius-Winkler","Daniel Weilenmann","Jochen Wöhrle","Georg Stachel","Sinisa Markovic","Gregor Leibundgut","Peter Rickenbacher","Stefan Osswald","Marco Cattaneo","Nicole Gilgen","Christoph Kaiser","Bruno Scheller"],"significance":7,"published":"2020-11-07","source_date":"2020-11-07","image":"","kennis":[],"congress":"","summary_en":"Long-term BASKET-SMALL 2 follow-up confirmed that drug-coated balloons maintain comparable outcomes to drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease over extended follow-up, supporting the leave-nothing-behind approach.","created":"2026-07-03T10:28:52Z","updated":"2026-07-03T13:28:01Z","licence":"Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.","body_markdown":"Lancet BASKET-SMALL 2 langetermijnresultaten van DCB versus DES bij kleine coronairarteriën.","abstract_original":"BACKGROUND: In the treatment of de-novo coronary small vessel disease, drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are non-inferior to drug-eluting stents (DESs) regarding clinical outcome up to 12 months, but data beyond 1 year is sparse. We aimed to test the long-term efficacy and safety of DCBs regarding clinical endpoints in an all-comer population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: In this prespecified long-term follow-up of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients from 14 clinical sites in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria with de-novo lesions in coronary vessels <3 mm and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned 1:1 to DCB or second-generation DES and followed over 3 years for major adverse cardiac events (ie, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularisation [TVR]), all-cause death, probable or definite stent thrombosis, and major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type 3-5). Analyses were performed on the full analysis set according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. Dual antiplatelet therapy was recommended for 1 month after DCB and 6 months after DES with stable symptoms, but 12 months with acute coronary syndromes. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01574534 and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between April 10, 2012, and Feb 1, 2017, of 883 patients assessed, 758 (86%) patients were randomly assigned to the DCB group (n=382) or the DES group (n=376). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 15% in both the DCB and DES groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0·99, 95% CI 0·68-1·45; p=0·95). The two groups were also very similar concerning the single components of adverse cardiac events: cardiac death (Kaplan-Meier estimate 5% vs 4%, HR 1·29, 95% CI 0·63-2·66; p=0·49), non-fatal myocardial infarction (both Kaplan-Meier estimate 6%, HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·45-1·51; p=0·52), and TVR (both Kaplan-Meier estimate 9%, HR 0·95, 95% CI 0·58-1·56; p=0·83). Rates of all-cause death were very similar in DCB versus DES patients (both Kaplan-Meier estimate 8%, HR 1·05, 95% CI 0·62-1·77; p=0·87). Rates of probable or definite stent thrombosis (Kaplan-Meier estimate 1% vs 2%; HR 0·33, 95% CI 0·07-1·64; p=0·18) and major bleeding (Kaplan-Meier estimate 2% vs 4%, HR 0·43, 95% CI 0·17-1·13; p=0·088) were numerically lower in DCB versus DES, however without reaching significance. INTERPRETATION: There is maintained efficacy and safety of DCB versus DES in the treatment of de-novo coronary small vessel disease up to 3 years. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation, Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation, and B Braun Medical."}