{"id":"f80a7093f52b","type":"article","url":"https://hartvaat.nl/2021/05/21/high-power-short-duration-versus-conventionele-rf-ablatie-bij-af-meta-analyse/","title":"High-power short-duration versus conventionele RF-ablatie bij AF: meta-analyse","title_en":"High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","category":"atriumfibrilleren","category_label":"Atriumfibrilleren","professions":["cardioloog"],"tags":[],"journal":"Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaa327","source_url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa327","authors":["Venkatesh Ravi","Abhushan Poudyal","Qurrat-Ul-Ain Abid","Timothy Larsen","Kousik Krishnan","Parikshit S Sharma","Richard G Trohman","Henry D Huang"],"significance":6,"published":"2021-05-21","source_date":"2021-05-21","image":"","kennis":[],"congress":"","summary_en":"This meta-analysis confirmed that high-power short-duration RF ablation for AF achieves comparable efficacy and safety to conventional lower-power approaches with shorter procedure times, supporting the accelerated protocol.","created":"2026-07-03T10:29:12Z","updated":"2026-07-03T13:28:20Z","licence":"Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.","body_markdown":"Systematische review en meta-analyse van high-power short-duration versus conventionele RF-ablatie bij AF.","abstract_original":"AIMS: We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched until 15 May 2020 for relevant studies comparing HPSD vs. conventional RFA in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for AF. A total of 15 studies involving 3718 adult patients were included in our meta-analysis (2357 in HPSD RFA and 1361 in conventional RFA). Freedom from atrial arrhythmia was higher in HPSD RFA when compared with conventional RFA [odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.90; P = 0.009]. Acute PV reconnection was lower (OR 0.56, P = 0.005) and first-pass isolation was higher (OR 3.58, P < 0.001) with HPSD RFA. There was no difference in total complications between the two groups (P = 0.19). Total procedure duration [mean difference (MD) -37.35 min, P < 0.001], fluoroscopy duration (MD -5.23 min, P = 0.001), and RF ablation time (MD -16.26 min, P < 0.001) were all significantly lower in HPSD RFA. High-power short-duration RFA also demonstrated higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia in the subgroup analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.29-2.50; P < 0.001), studies with ≥50 W protocol in the HPSD RFA group (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.18; P = 0.02] and studies with contact force sensing catheter use (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.21-2.25; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: High-power short-duration RFA was associated with better procedural effectiveness when compared with conventional RFA with comparable safety and shorter procedural duration."}