# FRAME-AMI: FFR-geleide versus complete PCI bij MI — NEJM

*geplaatst 2024-04-25 · Algemeen · The New England journal of medicine · doi 10.1056/NEJMoa2314149 · https://hartvaat.nl/2024/04/25/frame-ami-ffr-geleide-versus-complete-pci-bij-mi-nejm/*

De FRAME-AMI-trial in de NEJM vergeleek FFR-geleide met routine complete PCI bij MI met meervatslijden. FFR-geleide PCI resulteerde in minder stentplaatsingen met vergelijkbare klinische uitkomsten, wat selectieve revascularisatie bij MI ondersteunt.

## English: FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

The FRAME-AMI trial showed that FFR-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions resulted in fewer stent implantations with comparable clinical outcomes versus routine angiography-guided complete PCI in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease. FFR guidance may reduce overtreatment without compromising safety.

## Abstract (original, from the publication)

BACKGROUND: The benefit of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease remains unclear. METHODS: In this multinational, registry-based, randomized trial, we assigned patients with STEMI or very-high-risk non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease who were undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion to receive either FFR-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions or no further revascularization. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The two key secondary outcomes were a composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 1542 patients underwent randomization, with 764 assigned to receive FFR-guided complete revascularization and 778 assigned to receive culprit-lesion-only PCI. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 4.3 to 5.2), a primary-outcome event had occurred in 145 patients (19.0%) in the complete-revascularization group and in 159 patients (20.4%) in the culprit-lesion-only group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.17; P = 0.53). With respect to the secondary outcomes, no apparent between-group differences were observed in the composite of death from any cause or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.44) or unplanned revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.04). There were no apparent between-group differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI or very-high-risk NSTEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided complete revascularization was not shown to result in a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only PCI at 4.8 years. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; FULL REVASC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02862119.).

Auteurs: Felix Böhm, Brynjölfur Mogensen, Thomas Engstrøm, Goran Stankovic, Ilija Srdanovic, Jacob Lønborg, Sammy Zwackman, Mehmet Hamid, Thomas Kellerth, Jörg Lauermann, Olli A Kajander, Jonas Andersson, Rikard Linder, Oskar Angerås, Henrik Renlund, Andrejs Ērglis, Madhav Menon, Carl Schultz, Mika Laine, Claes Held, Andreas Rück, Ollie Östlund, Stefan James

---
Bron: The New England journal of medicine, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314149. Bijgewerkt 2026-07-03T13:29:56Z. Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.