{"id":"413a326d2d15","type":"article","url":"https://hartvaat.nl/2025/12/11/manchetloze-bloeddrukmeting-aha-wetenschappelijk-statement/","title":"Manchetloze bloeddrukmeting: AHA-wetenschappelijk statement","title_en":"Cuffless Devices for the Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association","category":"hypertensie","category_label":"Hypertensie","professions":["cardioloog","huisarts","internist"],"tags":[],"journal":"Hypertension","doi":"https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000254","source_url":"https://doi.org/https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000254","authors":[],"significance":7,"published":"2025-12-11","source_date":"2025-12-11","image":"","kennis":["https://hartvaat.nl/kennis/hypertensie/bloeddrukmeting-thuismeting-abpm/"],"congress":"","summary_en":"This AHA scientific statement evaluated cuffless blood pressure measurement devices, addressing the potential and limitations of continuous, non-invasive BP monitoring technologies as alternatives to conventional cuff-based measurement.","created":"2026-07-03T10:25:41Z","updated":"2026-07-03T13:25:04Z","licence":"Citeer vrij, met bronvermelding en een link naar hartvaat.nl (de url van het record). Samenvattingen zijn redactioneel werk van HartVaat; de oorspronkelijke publicaties blijven van hun uitgevers (doi). Geen medisch advies.","body_markdown":"Conventionele manchetbloeddrukmeting kent beperkingen waaronder ongemak en beperkte meetfrequentie. Manchetloze apparaten bieden een alternatief. Dit AHA-statement evalueert de huidige stand van zaken van manchetloze bloeddruktechnologie.","abstract_original":"Hypertension, Volume 83, Issue 3, Page e00254, March 1, 2026. Conventional cuff-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring has several limitations, including patient discomfort with arm cuff inflation, inconvenience, and limited frequency of readings. Cuffless BP devices, which are increasingly available for purchase on the international market, have the potential to remove barriers to BP measurement in both research and clinical care. However, there are unanswered questions on whether, how, and in what settings these devices may be appropriate for use. Gaps include the need to understand whether the somewhat distinctive and often enormous volume of readings obtained by these devices have meaningful relationships with clinical outcomes and are appropriate for determining actionable interventions. Furthermore, international standards for determining the accuracy of some, but not yet all, of these devices only recently became available and do not provide a full assessment of the typical use of"}