SANTORINI UK: LDL-doel onbereikt bij meerderheid van hoogrisicopatiënten na 1 jaar
Secundaire analyse van de SANTORINI-studie (663 Britse patiënten met hoog/zeer hoog cardiovasculair risico, 8.502 in andere Europese landen) onderzocht 1-jaarsveranderingen in lipidenverlagende therapie en LDL-doelbereiking.
Het percentage zonder LLT daalde in het VK van 20,4% naar 7,1%. Monotherapie is dominant in het VK (74,8% baseline → 84,9% op 1 jaar), terwijl combinatietherapie elders sneller toenam (van 27,1% naar 40,2%).
Gemiddelde LDL-C in het VK daalde van 2,5 naar 2,1 mmol/L. Toch haalt een meerderheid de NICE- en ESC/EAS-doelen niet — ruimte voor intensivering, vooral met combinatietherapie.
Abstract (original)
OBJECTIVES: This real-world study investigated the changes of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) usage in patients with high or very high cardiovascular (CV) risk in the UK and the group of all other European countries in the SANTORINI study up to 1 year from baseline and the impact this treatment had on the attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) risk-adjusted goals set by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and those in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidaemia guidelines. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the SANTORINI dataset (an international, prospective, observational, non-interventional study (NCT04271280)). SETTING: Primary and secondary care centres in the UK and the group of other European countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland). PARTICIPANTS: 663 UK patients with high and very high CV risk were included in this analysis and 8502 from the group of other European countries. Of these, 380 UK patients and 6830 from the group of other European countries had LDL-C information available at baseline and 1-year follow-up. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary objectives were to describe patients' lipid management, LDL-C levels at 1-year follow-up and their attainment of 2023 NICE (≤2.0 mmol/L) and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C 2019 guideline-recommended LDL-C goals (<1.4 mmol/L for very high-risk patients and <1.8 mmol/L for high-risk patients) within this time frame. RESULTS: Over the course of 1-year follow-up, the overall proportion of UK patients on no LLT reduced from 20.4% at baseline to 7.1%, similar to that observed in the group of other European countries (baseline-20.9%, 1 year-3.0%). The proportion of UK patients receiving LLT monotherapy increased from 74.8% at baseline to 84.9%, higher at both time points than that observed for the group of other European countries (baseline: 52.0%, 1 year: 55.0%). The use of any combination therapy increased slightly from baseline to 1 year in the UK overall cohort (4.9% vs 7.1%) and overall in the group of all other European countries, the cohort increased from baseline (27.1%) to 1 year (40.2%). Overall, mean (SD) LDL-C levels in the UK were 2.5 (1.2) mmol/L at baseline and 2.1 (1.0) mmol/L at 1 year and for the group of other European countries were 2.4 (1.2) mmol/L at baseline and 2.0 (0.9) mmol/L at 1 year. The overall proportions of UK patients achieving the UK NICE treatment goal and ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines at baseline versus 1-year follow-up were 40.3% vs 52.6% and 22.9% vs 32.9%, respectively; 21.1% and 30.9% of patients in the group of other European countries achieved the ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines at baseline and 1-year follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this UK-focused analysis of the SANTORINI study, use of LLT increased modestly over 1 year, accompanied by a reduction in average LDL-C levels. However, mean LDL-C remained above the NICE goal, and attainment of both NICE and ESC/EAS LDL-C thresholds remained suboptimal. The findings highlight continued opportunities to optimise lipid management in UK clinical practice, including the potential for broader use of combination therapies.
Dit artikel is een samenvatting van een publicatie in BMJ open. Voor het volledige artikel, alle details en referenties verwijzen wij u naar de oorspronkelijke bron.
Lees het volledige artikelDOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-114031

