Gepersonaliseerde versus standaard DAPT-duur na PCI: gerandomiseerde trial
Trial vergeleek gepersonaliseerde (risicogestratificeerde) met standaard DAPT-duur na PCI. De gepersonaliseerde benadering optimaliseerde de balans tussen ischemie en bloeding.
Abstract (original)
BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), although its optimal duration remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The authors performed a randomized trial comparing a personalized duration of DAPT, based on a risk score, for 3, 6, or 24 months with a standard duration of DAPT for 12 months after PCI. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2,107 patients undergoing PCI to receive either a personalized or a standard DAPT. The primary endpoint was a net adverse clinical event (NACE) at 24 months, defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent target vessel revascularization, or type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. RESULTS: At 24 months, NACE occurred in 196 of 1,055 patients (18.6%) in the personalized DAPT group and in 232 of 1,052 patients (22.2%) in the standard DAPT group (difference, 3.54 percentage points; 95% CI: -6.99 to -0.99; P = 0.040). This difference was mainly related to decreased rates of myocardial infarction (difference, -2.29 percentage points; 95% CI: -4.43 to -0.14) and urgent target vessel revascularization (difference, -1.30 percentage points; 95% CI: -2.55 to -0.05). Bleeding occurred at similar rates between the 2 groups (difference, -0.41 percentage points; 95% CI: -2.92 to 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PCI, a personalized DAPT duration from 3 to 24 months based on a clinical risk score led to a lowered risk of NACE than standard care consisting of 12 months of DAPT. (Personalized Vs. Standard Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and New-generation Polymer-Free vs- Biodegradable-Polymer DES [PARTHENOPE]; NCT04135989).
Dit artikel is een samenvatting van een publicatie in Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Voor het volledige artikel, alle details en referenties verwijzen wij u naar de oorspronkelijke bron.
Lees het volledige artikelDOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.040